This page answers most of the common queries that we receive about
our license, licensing use of the software, and packaging or
redistributing it.
Please check the following list to see if any of the
descriptions match your situation. Each one is described in more detail
in the following paragraphs.
Here are the detailed answers for each of the questions above.
Where can I find the Apache license?
See the following links; 2.0 is the current version while 1.1 and 1.0
are older versions that the ASF no longer use:
I'm not a lawyer. What does it all MEAN?
Describing legal documents in non-legalese is fraught with potential
for misinterpretation. Notwithstanding the text that follows, the
actual text of the license itself is legally
binding and authoritative.
That said, here's what the Apache license says in layman's terms:
It allows you to:
- freely download and use Apache software, in whole or
in part, for personal, company internal, or commercial purposes;
- use Apache software in packages or distributions that
you create.
It forbids you to:
- redistribute any piece of Apache-originated software
without proper attribution;
- use any marks owned by The Apache Software Foundation in
any way that might state or imply that the Foundation endorses
your distribution;
- use any marks owned by The Apache Software Foundation in
any way that might state or imply that you created the Apache
software in question.
It requires you to:
- include a copy of the license in any
redistribution you may make that includes Apache software;
- provide clear attribution to The Apache Software Foundation
for any distributions that include Apache software.
It does not require you to:
- include the source of the Apache software itself, or of any
modifications you may have made to it, in any redistribution
you may assemble that includes it;
- submit changes that you make to the software back to the Apache
Software Foundation (though such feedback is encouraged).
If I'm using Apache software can I simply adhere to the Apache
License 2.0, or do I have to also adhere to the Apache Software
License versions 1.0 and 1.1?
It depends entirely on which versions of our software you are
talking about - you should adhere to the version of our license that
covered the software in question. It should be exceedingly rare to
come across version 1.0, and all active products should have had a
version released under the Apache License 2.0. Feel free to contact
the relevant project if you are unable to find an AL 2.0 version of
their software.
Why are the license files for the different Apache
Software Foundation projects different?
While the core Apache developed code will be under one of the
Apache licenses, other third party works may have been
included and their license text may have been added to the Apache
projects' LICENSE or NOTICE files. Alternatively, they may
be available separately.
Is 'Apache' a trademark?
'Apache', 'Apache Software Foundation', the multicoloured feather,
and the various Apache project names and logos are trademarks of The
Apache Software Foundation, and are usable by others only with express
permission from the ASF.
Please see our Trademark Policy for more details.
Is software from The Apache Software Foundation free of charge?
Yes. All software developed by all projects of
The Apache Software Foundation is freely available without charge
from the Foundation's Web sites. This is specified in the
Foundation's
Articles of Incorporation.
Is there a fee for using Apache software in a commercial
product?
No. We do not distinguish between personal, internal, or
commercial use of our software. Packaging and redistribution
of any of it is subject to the terms of our
license, however.
What are the U.S. Export Classification Control
Numbers (ECCNs) for the various Apache software packages?
May I license my own software under the Apache license?
Certainly. Version 2.0 of the license was designed to be reusable, and
often has been reused by parties other than the ASF.
May I re-use (and modify) the ASF Contributor
License Agreements (CLAs) for my own purposes?
Yes, you are allowed to use and modify them. You just can't hold
the ASF legally responsible if these documents are not exactly what
you intend them to be. We recommend that you obtain your own legal
advice so you know exactly what you are getting yourself into.
Also, if you adopt these agreements for your purposes, you have
to make sure that the phrase 'Apache Software Foundation' or any
confusingly similar references or parts that specifically refer to
the Apache organisation do not appear in your version of the agreements
(except to note that your version is derived and differs from the
original provided by the ASF).
I've made improvements to the Apache
code; may I distribute the modified result?
Absolutely -- subject to the terms of the Apache license,
of course. You can give your modified code away for free,
or sell it, or keep it to yourself, or whatever you like. Just
remember that the original code is still covered by the
Apache license and you must comply with its terms. Even if you
change every single line of the Apache code you're using, the
result is still based on the Foundation's licensed code. You
may distribute the result under a different license, but you
need to acknowledge the use of the Foundation's software. To
do otherwise would be stealing.
If you think your changes would be found useful by others,
though, we do encourage you to submit them to the
appropriate Apache project for possible inclusion.
May I call my modified code 'Apache'?
In a word, no. You may, however, use phrasing such
as 'based on Apache', 'powered by Apache', or 'based on Apache
technology'. You must not use the Foundation's marks
in any way that states or implies, or can be interpreted as
stating or implying, that the final product is endorsed or
created by the Apache Software Foundation. For example, it would
be acceptable to use a name like 'SuperWonderServer powered by Apache',
but never a name like 'Apache SuperWonderServer'. This is similar
to the distinction between a product named 'Microsoft Burp' and
'Burp for Microsoft Windows'.
You may similarly identify the specific Foundation project
whose code you're using, such as with 'based on Apache Xerces'
or 'powered by Apache Tomcat technology'.
If you wish to use a name including any of the Foundation's
marks, such as the word 'Apache', it's best to ask our permission
first. Please see our Trademark Policy for more details.
I have made changes to an Apache package
and I want to distribute them. Do I need to contribute them to the
Apache Software Foundation?
No. You can keep your changes a secret if you like.
Maybe your modifications are embarrassing, maybe you'll get rich
selling those improvements. Whatever. But please seriously
consider giving your changes back! We all benefit when you do.
May I translate the Apache license into my local language
for my redistribution of Apache packages?
Yes, you may translate the license text into your local language.
However, any such translated text is only for the convenience
of understanding, and is not legally binding. Only the
English-language version of the license, which you must continue
to include in your packaging, is authoritative and applicable
in case legal interpretation is required.
Is the Apache license compatible with the GPL
(GNU Public License)?
From the Free Software Foundation website:
-
Apache License, Version 2.0
-
This is a free software license, compatible with version 3 of the GPL.
Please note that this license is not compatible with GPL version 2, because
it has some requirements that are not in the older version. These include
certain patent termination and indemnification provisions.
What is the scope of patent grants made to the ASF?
This is a four part question:
- Q1:
- If I own a patent and contribute to a Work,
and, at the time my
contribution is included in that Work, none of my patent's claims are
subject to Apache's Grant of Patent License, is there a way any of
those claims would later become subject to the Grant of Patent
License solely due to subsequent contributions by other parties who
are not licensees of that patent.
- A1:
- No.
- Q2:
- If at any time after my contribution,
I am able to license other
patent claims that would have been subject to Apache's Grant of
Patent License if they were licenseable by me at the time of my
contribution, do those other claims become subject to the Grant of
Patent License?
- A2:
- Yes.
- Q3:
- If I own or control a licensable patent
and contribute code to a specific Apache product, which of my patent claims
are subject to Apache's Grant of Patent License?
- A3:
- The only patent claims that are licensed
to the ASF are those you own or have the right to license that read on your
contribution or on the combination of your contribution with the specific
Apache product to which you contributed as it existed at the time of your
contribution. No additional patent claims become licensed as a
result of subsequent combinations of your contribution with any
other software. Note, however, that licensable patent claims include
those that you acquire in the future, as long as they read on your
original contribution as made at the original time. Once a patent
claim is subject to Apache's Grant of Patent License, it is licensed
under the terms of that Grant to the ASF and to recipients of any
software distributed by the ASF for any Apache software product
whatsoever.
- Q4:
- What is an Apache product?
- Q3:
- An Apache product is a body of software
being developed by the ASF that the ASF intends to both alter and to publish
as a separate line of releases.
If you have questions about The Apache Software Foundation, its
projects, or its software, we recommend the following link for more
information or assistance:
If you have a question specifically about the Apache license
or distribution of Apache software, and it has not been answered
by this page, you may send a message to <human-response@Apache.Org>
requesting clarification. Note: If you send a
question that is answered by the information on this page
your message may be IGNORED.